Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 7-1 | None |
| Golgari Obliterator | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Golgari Midrange | vitorcarvalho01 | 7-2 | None |
| Gruul Aggro | _batutinha_ | 7-2 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | pnutz47 | 6-2 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | dr4ken | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Bant Beanstalk , Bant Gearhulk , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Demons , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Lifedrain Combo , Golgari Midrange , Golgari Obliterator
Meta Performance Analysis
Sentinel of the Nameless City ranks #286 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 70%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 65.6%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Sentinel of the Nameless City is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 10.96 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Sentinel of the Nameless City has a win rate of 69.0%, making it 6.9% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 33 | 72.8% | 13 |
| Invasion of Gobakhan | Battle — Siege // Enchantment | 12 | 70.4% | 5 |
| Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 18 | 69.4% | 8 |
| Kellan, Daring Traveler | Legendary Creature — Human Faerie Scout // Sorcery — Adventure | 13 | 68.9% | 6 |
| Aven Interrupter | Creature — Bird Rogue | 24 | 68.5% | 10 |
| Overprotect | Instant | 10 | 66.8% | 4 |
| Torch the Witness | Sorcery | 27 | 66.5% | 6 |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 8 | 65.5% | 5 |
| Steel Seraph | Artifact Creature — Angel | 21 | 64.8% | 9 |
| Breach the Multiverse | Sorcery | 14 | 63.6% | 5 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Sentinel of the Nameless City than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumbering Worldwagon | Artifact — Vehicle | 3 | 5 | 100.0% | 84.5% | +15.5% |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 2 | 10 | 82.5% | 71.7% | +10.8% |
| Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 76.0% | +7.4% |
| Surrak, Elusive Hunter | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 3 | 8 | 80.0% | 73.2% | +6.8% |
| Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 25 | 76.3% | 70.3% | +5.9% |
| Nissa, Ascended Animist | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 7 | 17 | 76.9% | 71.8% | +5.1% |
| Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 4 | 14 | 75.7% | 72.2% | +3.5% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 24 | 75.6% | 72.3% | +3.3% |
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 23 | 73.6% | 70.4% | +3.1% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 14 | 73.8% | 70.8% | +3.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | 672 | 32.4% | 46.7% |
| Golgari Midrange | 547 | 70.4% | 46.4% |
| Golgari Demons | 290 | 53.2% | 47.7% |
| Selesnya Artifacts | 21 | 100.0% | 69.6% |
| Golgari Obliterator | 14 | 93.3% | 51.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.